In a surprising turn of events, royal expert Hugo Vickers has raised alarms about the state of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle‘s marriage, suggesting that all may not be well as the Duke approaches his 40th birthday.
With whispers of discord echoing from Montecito Royale, Vickers points to two significant indicators of trouble that have caught the attention of royal watchers.
First, let’s delve into the peculiar absence of Meghan’s name in Harry’s recent birthday statement.
While he fondly mentioned their children, Archie and Lilibet, Meghan was notably left out.
This omission has sparked speculation among observers that their relationship might be on shaky ground.
Could it be that Harry is feeling overshadowed by Meghan, a sentiment echoed by some of his former friends who claim he appears unhappy and relegated to a supporting role in their life together?
Vickers elaborates on this concern, highlighting the high turnover rate of staff surrounding the couple as another troubling sign.
According to him, the inability to maintain a stable household staff could indicate deeper issues within their marriage.
He remarked on the surprising nature of Harry’s omission of Meghan, noting that he typically includes her in such statements.
This change could suggest that things are far from rosy in their relationship.
As Harry reflects on his life choices leading up to this milestone birthday, Vickers believes he may consider the repercussions of his public statements and actions, which have strained his ties with the royal family.
The expert pointed out the drastic decision made by the couple to step back from royal duties in 2020, a move that has led them into a very different world—one that may not be as welcoming as they had hoped.
The media landscape is shifting, too.
Vickers suggests that public sentiment is changing, with many now viewing Harry and Meghan less favorably than before.
Once seen as royal darlings, they are increasingly being perceived as opportunists, relying heavily on their dwindling royal celebrity status.
The press, he notes, is beginning to see through their facade, which could spell trouble for their future visibility and relevance.
Meghan, described by Vickers as the more proactive partner, seems to be the one steering their agenda.
Observers note that while Meghan thrives in the spotlight, Harry often appears uncomfortable and discontented.
Their recent public appearances, including a supposed royal tour in Colombia, showcased Meghan’s radiant smile contrasted with Harry’s visibly strained demeanor.
It raises the question: Is he truly happy in this setup?
The expert also pointed out that Harry’s social circle has become increasingly curated by Meghan, isolating him further from his old friends.
This shift could lead to a lack of genuine support as he navigates his new life, especially during significant moments like his birthday.
While he finds joy in fatherhood, the absence of Meghan in his birthday message casts a shadow over that happiness.
Vickers expresses concern for the couple’s children, who might grow up without a connection to their royal relatives.
The thought of Archie and Lilibet discovering their cousin is a future king while being raised in California conjures a sense of loss.
Will they ever understand the legacy they belong to, or will they be forever distanced from their royal heritage?
Adding to the turmoil, Meghan has once again been labeled as “Duchess Difficult” by staff members, with reports surfacing of her demanding behavior.
Allegations of bullying have resurfaced, reminiscent of claims made during her time in the UK.
Vickers recalls instances of her rudeness towards staff, which reportedly led to a reprimand from Queen Elizabeth II herself.
Such behavior could contribute to the ongoing instability in their household.
Looking ahead, Vickers doesn’t paint a hopeful picture for Harry and Meghan.
He draws parallels to the Duke of Windsor, suggesting that if they fail to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of celebrity and public expectation, their future may be bleak.
He senses a growing divide between the couple, with Meghan potentially ready to carve out her own identity independent of Harry.
Interestingly, Meghan has already begun to establish her brand, signing with WME without Harry, indicating a desire for autonomy.
As she ventures into projects like her cooking show, it raises the question of how long their partnership can withstand the pressures of individual ambitions.
Ultimately, Vickers emphasizes the need for Harry to reflect on his choices as he enters this new chapter.
The signs of marital strain are evident, and unless both parties address these issues, they may find themselves drifting further apart.
The question remains: will they be able to navigate these turbulent waters together, or is a separation on the horizon?
