As Prince Harry and Meghan Markle gear up for their highly anticipated tour of Colombia, not everyone in royal circles is rolling out the red carpet.
In fact, the couple’s choice to visit this vibrant South American nation, right after their trip to Nigeria, has drawn sharp criticism from former courtiers and royal commentators alike.
The discontent seems to stem from what some perceive as a blatant disregard for royal traditions.
A former courtier, who spoke with the Daily Beast, expressed deep concerns about the Sussexes’ actions, suggesting they demonstrate a “complete contempt” for the monarchy and its time-honored practices.
Royal tours have historically served as a means of diplomacy, forging connections, and strengthening friendships on behalf of the United Kingdom.
Yet, this upcoming tour, while perhaps well-intentioned, appears disconnected from its royal roots, leading to frustration among royal watchers.
The disapproval doesn’t stop there; it’s compounded by a recent setback for Prince Harry regarding their Colombian stay.
A notable hotel in Colombia has abruptly canceled his reservation at a five-star establishment.
According to a report from the Royal Saga YouTube channel, the cancellation was attributed to unforeseen circumstances that prevented the hotel from honoring the booking.
However, whispers suggest that rising local discontent towards the Sussexes may have influenced this decision.
Reports indicate that there is a palpable dissatisfaction among Colombians concerning Harry’s impending visit.
This backlash could very well be a factor in the hotel’s sudden change of heart.
The cancellation comes at a time when the couple is already facing scrutiny for what many see as an air of entitlement and a relentless quest for media attention.
Since stepping back from their roles as senior royals, Harry and Meghan have been on a mission to redefine their public personas.
However, choosing to visit Colombia—a country grappling with high murder rates—has raised eyebrows.
This decision seems particularly curious given Harry’s recent frustrations over security arrangements back in the UK.
Harry has voiced his disappointment, claiming that King Charles could intervene in his ongoing legal battle regarding security provisions.
However, the reality is that security decisions are made by the government, not the monarch.
A royal insider pointed out that it would be entirely inappropriate for King Charles to meddle in such matters, while a source close to Harry contended that if the king truly wanted to help, he could.
Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams weighed in on the situation, noting that Harry and Meghan have not shied away from taking jabs at the royal family.
They often utilize their platform to bring up topics that could potentially embarrass the institution.
Fitzwilliams remarked that their recent actions suggest a willingness to openly criticize the royal family, blurring the lines of their stated intent to do things their own way.
This ongoing rift between the Sussexes and the royal family continues to loom large, shaping public perception of both parties.
Fitzwilliams highlighted that while Harry and Meghan claim to be acting independently, their actions inevitably draw focus back to themselves rather than the royal family.