Meghan Markle is no stranger to the spotlight, frequently making headlines thanks to her captivating life and decisions.
Recently, a particularly interesting claim has emerged regarding her time on the set of “Suits.”
It was suggested that she wore personal jewellery while embodying the character Rachel Zane.
This revelation begs the question: is it authenticity or embellishment that we’re witnessing here?
Markle has stated that the jewellery she wore on the show was deeply personal, including cherished family heirlooms like her grandmother’s charm bracelet and her signet ring.
While this sentiment tugs at the heartstrings, a closer examination reveals some discrepancies.
Observers have pointed out that certain pieces, such as the Jenar tale necklaces, were custom-made for the series.
This raises the possibility that her claims about wearing family treasures might be more of a carefully crafted narrative than an unvarnished truth.
In a chat with Hello!, Meghan shared her excitement about purchasing a luxurious Cartier Tank watch after “Suits” was renewed for its third season.
She revealed that she treated herself to the two-tone version and even had it engraved with the phrase “to millimetre from millimetre,” intending it as a keepsake for her future daughter.
However, this description has left watch aficionados scratching their heads, as the term “French Tank” sounds more suited for a late-night infomercial than a genuine reference to the iconic watch style.
This inconsistency hints at either a charming ignorance about luxury items or a deliberate effort to curate a specific image.
Typically, heirlooms carry emotional significance without overt self-referential engravings.
One can’t help but wonder if the allure of a customized Cartier played a role in her decision-making, or if she was simply preparing for a future where her initials would be well-known.
Regardless, this act of self-gifting seems quintessentially Meghan, perfectly embodying her persona.
There’s also speculation surrounding whether Meghan procured jewellery specifically for her role on “Suits,” perhaps signaling to designers that she could offer them valuable exposure.
This clever strategy would not only enhance her wardrobe but also subtly promote brands.
The notion of treating jewellery like party favors—graciously accepting pieces as parting gifts from the set—doesn’t seem far-fetched.
It’s a common marketing tactic where items are borrowed for promotional purposes but conveniently kept afterward.
Another layer to Meghan’s story involves her claims of being multilingual.
She has often mentioned her fluency in French; however, her confidence appeared to waver when a film crew in Montreal began conversing in the language, leaving her feeling somewhat out of place.
Tom Bauer’s book, “Revenge,” suggests that she felt frustrated by her inability to keep up, despite claiming to have studied French for eight years at one point.
This discrepancy raises questions about her actual proficiency—was it four years, or eight?
When confronted with a language barrier, her strategy seemed to boil down to simply saying “Bonjour” and hoping for the best.
So, what’s the essence of the matter?
Did Meghan Markle indeed take jewellery from the “Suits” set?
The answer may remain elusive.
