In recent months, a rather bizarre conspiracy theory has gained traction online: the assertion that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry‘s children, Archie and Lilibet, are mere fabrications.
This claim has sparked heated discussions among skeptics who scrutinize every aspect of the Sussexes’ lives.
However, it’s important to note that these allegations are extreme and lack any verified evidence.
To understand the roots of this controversy, we must first look back at Meghan Markle’s past.
Before marrying Prince Harry in 2018, she was wed to Trevor Engelson from 2011 to 2013.
Following her royal marriage, some online commentators began speculating about Engelson’s potential insider knowledge regarding Meghan.
This speculation has fueled rumors that he might reveal shocking truths about Meghan and Harry, including the existence of their children.
The situation escalated in March 2022 when an anonymous post claiming to be from Engelson circulated online.
In this post, the author alleged that Archie and Lilibet were not real children and that Meghan had fabricated her pregnancies as part of a publicity stunt.
This sensational claim quickly gained traction within skeptical online communities, where doubts about the Sussexes’ family life already existed.
However, it’s crucial to approach such anonymous claims with caution.
Trevor Engelson has never publicly commented on Meghan or their children, making it highly questionable whether this post actually originated from him.
The anonymity of the internet allows anyone to make unverified statements, and Engelson has valid reasons to avoid involvement in such serious accusations against his ex-wife.
Slanderous claims without evidence could expose him to legal repercussions.
Moreover, it’s essential to recognize the psychological aspect at play here.
Those who harbor doubts about the Sussexes may find it comforting to believe in this narrative.
Yet, we must be vigilant against falling prey to confirmation bias, where we accept information that aligns with our beliefs while dismissing contrary evidence.
Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof, and this anonymous post fails to deliver anything substantiating its assertions.
Let’s also consider the practicalities of pregnancy and childbirth.
The idea that Meghan could successfully fake two high-risk pregnancies without alerting medical professionals or royal staff is implausible.
Pregnancy is not a simple act that can be concealed from family and friends, let alone the public eye.
Hospitals maintain legal birth records, and if Archie and Lilibet were not real, one would expect irrefutable evidence to emerge by now.
Additionally, Meghan was photographed numerous times during her pregnancies, showcasing visible baby bumps.
The logistics of fabricating ultrasounds and prenatal appointments would require an extensive conspiracy involving many individuals, which is an unlikely scenario.
The physical realities of pregnancy—swollen feet, back pain, and the act of giving birth—are experiences that cannot be convincingly faked over an extended period.
Regarding the birth records, while it is true that Archie and Lilibet’s birth certificates have not been publicly released, the Sussexes are under no obligation to share such private information.
UK law mandates that births are documented, and the lack of public disclosure does not imply that the children do not exist.
Royal births often involve voluntary announcements, not mandatory public records.
Critics have also pointed out the absence of baptism records as evidence against the children’s existence.
However, baptism ceremonies are typically private affairs and do not require public documentation.
The Sussexes’ choice to keep their children’s religious milestones private aligns with modern practices for royal families and celebrities alike.
Claims suggesting that all photos of Archie and Lilibet are manipulated are equally unfounded.
The Sussexes have released multiple images of Archie over the years, showcasing his growth in various settings.
Details like skin imperfections and natural lighting make it incredibly challenging to convincingly fabricate such images over time.
Speculation about odd coincidences in photographs often stems from a desire to confirm existing doubts rather than objective analysis.
Furthermore, the notion that Archie and Lilibet will mysteriously reappear as teenagers to promote a cause is simply ludicrous.
Children do not vanish for years and then materialize as adults.
The mental gymnastics required to deny their existence highlight the lengths some will go to uphold their beliefs, despite the absence of credible evidence.
The crux of the issue lies in the complete lack of substantial proof backing these conspiracy theories.
Anonymous posts, unverified claims about missing records, and wild speculation about photos do not constitute evidence.
Those who propagate these theories need to provide factual support rather than rely on conjecture.
Ultimately, the Sussexes have every right to raise their children away from the relentless scrutiny of the public eye.
It is vital to approach discussions about their family with empathy and reason.
Targeting minors with unfounded speculation is not only harmful but also unacceptable.
We should strive for conversations that respect the dignity and privacy of all individuals, especially vulnerable children.
In the absence of undeniable proof that challenges the existence of Archie and Lilibet, the most reasonable position is to accept that they are indeed real, living children.
As society grapples with these sensational claims, it is crucial to prioritize facts and evidence over unverified rumors.
Balancing skepticism with logical reasoning will help guide us toward a more informed understanding of this complex issue.