In a recent video, the host of Black Belt Barrister couldn’t contain their laughter while discussing the mixed reception of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry‘s new website.
The BBC article that sparked this reaction highlighted the site’s peculiar launch, which has not exactly won over the public.
Instead of excitement, the response has been more akin to bewilderment, leaving many to wonder about the couple’s intentions.
The website greets visitors with a minimalist dark blue page—a color often associated with trust and quality.
However, the choice feels ironic given that the site barely touches on royal themes, apart from some vague references to titles.
It features a charming image of the couple, reminiscent of their appearance at the Invictus Games, but notably omits any mention of other royals, creating an air of detachment from their former lives.
One can’t help but notice the almost presidential vibe of the new site, complete with coat of arms and ambitious biographies.
It aims for a classy yet simple aesthetic, which could easily double as an advertisement for upscale chocolates.
The transition from Sussexroyal.com to Sussex.com raises eyebrows—did they really have to abandon their royal branding entirely?
Interestingly, despite the sleek new presentation, links to their previous royal website still linger in the corners, suggesting a reluctance to fully sever ties with their past.
They had been advised against using royal titles after stepping back from their official roles, yet their biographies continue to dance around the subject, presenting a peculiar contradiction.
Prince Harry’s profile highlights his military service and charitable endeavors but conspicuously leaves out his position in the royal hierarchy.
It’s as if they want to embrace their royal past while simultaneously distancing themselves from it.
This duality raises questions: Are they attempting to leverage their titles for business ventures while avoiding accusations of exploiting royal connections?
The absence of references to other royals is striking.
Critics have pointed out the apparent hypocrisy in promoting themselves as part of the royal family while neglecting to acknowledge it in their official profiles.
It seems calculated, as if they’re trying to maintain a semblance of royal prestige without the baggage that comes with it.
The website also emphasizes Meghan’s commitment to feminism and advocacy for women and girls, showcasing her efforts in humanitarian and business sectors.
Yet, her time as a royal is barely mentioned, reflecting a desire to carve out a new identity separate from her marriage.
This shift might signal future projects aimed at social issues, but the lack of royal context feels like an intentional omission.
Despite their claims of independence, the site still prominently features their children’s titles, referring to them as Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.
This contradiction illustrates the complex relationship they maintain with their royal heritage.
While they may not fulfill traditional royal duties, they are still keen on asserting their family’s titles.
The backlash to the website has been a mixed bag, with both supporters and detractors weighing in.
Their claim that “Sussex is our name” raises eyebrows because, technically, Prince Harry does not have a formal surname.
The confusion surrounding titles and names only adds to the intrigue of their new venture.
As for Harry’s potential return to royal duties, speculation is rife.
Recent reports suggest there’s little chance he will step back into any temporary role, especially following tensions with his brother William and father King Charles.
The palace has reportedly dismissed the idea entirely, leaving many to wonder what Harry’s future holds.
There’s a palpable tension in the air regarding Harry’s possible involvement in royal affairs.
With a history of public scrutiny and backlash from his previous revelations about family dynamics, the question remains: Would his return be welcomed, or would it only stir more controversy?
