Meghan Markle and Prince Harry‘s recent trip to Colombia has stirred up quite a buzz, with many questioning the authenticity of their public displays of affection.
Since stepping back from their royal duties in 2020, the couple seems intent on maintaining an air of royal elegance, but are they just putting on a show?
Their journey kicked off with a breakfast meeting in Bogota alongside Colombia’s Vice President, Francia Marquez, and her husband, Rafael Yerney Pinillo.
Dressed in a lavish £598 Orlinda vest by designer Veronica Beard, Meghan certainly made a statement.
Meanwhile, Harry donned a tailored navy suit, embodying the role of the protective husband as he wrapped his arm around Meghan.
But their seemingly affectionate gestures didn’t go unnoticed, raising eyebrows among observers.
Lip-reading expert Nicola Hickling noted a revealing moment between the couple as they exited a building.
According to Hickling, Meghan leaned in and whispered a simple command to Harry: “Hand.” To which Harry promptly replied, “Here you go.” This exchange felt staged, leading many to wonder if their interactions are more for show than genuine affection.
The dynamics of their relationship have sparked speculation.
Meghan’s directive to Harry resembles a parent instructing a child, suggesting a power imbalance where Harry appears to be a compliant partner.
Is it possible that Harry has become a pawn in Meghan’s carefully crafted narrative?
For someone who champions feminism, Meghan’s behavior seems at odds with her self-image, portraying her as needy and demanding rather than empowered.
It raises an intriguing question about Harry’s autonomy.
Once a free-spirited prince, he now appears to be molded into a version of himself that aligns with Meghan’s desires.
The apparent submissiveness to her commands has ignited discussions about his overall well-being.
With recent headlines involving personal tragedies, like that of Matthew Perry’s assistant, the idea of misplaced trust looms ominously.
Can Harry genuinely rely on the person closest to him?
As their tour progressed, the couple visited the Collegio Cultura Popular, a school for children in Bogota.
Harry attempted to win over the crowd by counting in Spanish and sharing anecdotes about their kids, Archie and Lilibet.
However, a minor slip in his phrasing raised eyebrows.
When he said, “I’ve young children and they’re not on social media,” it prompted curiosity about his choice of words.
The use of “I” instead of “we” when referring to his children hinted at a potential disconnect in their family dynamics.
Some observers found humor in Harry’s comments about controlling his children’s exposure to social media, considering the pervasive nature of the digital world today.
It seems a bit naive for a father raising his kids in America to think he can shield them completely from its influence.
Despite their busy agenda, Meghan and Harry’s Colombian tour continues to provoke more questions than answers.
Invited by VP Marquez, their schedule includes meetings with leaders and discussions on pressing issues like cyberbullying.
Yet, amid the smiles and handshakes, one can’t shake the feeling that much of this is a carefully orchestrated performance aimed at preserving their brand.
The Colombian experience serves as a reminder that when it comes to Meghan and Harry, appearances can be deceiving.
The couple’s efforts to maintain a royal façade may resonate with some, but for many, the underlying tensions within their relationship are hard to ignore.
As they navigate their new life away from the monarchy, the world watches closely, eager to discern what’s real and what’s merely an act.