In the latest round of royal commentary, a columnist from The Telegraph has sparked outrage with her critique of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle‘s affectionate displays, particularly their hand-holding.
This seemingly innocent gesture has been labeled as “performative” by Judith Woods, who argues that it is an attempt to project an image of unity that starkly contrasts with the more reserved demeanor of Prince William and Kate Middleton.
But why does this simple act of love trigger such strong reactions?
For years, the narrative surrounding Harry and Meghan has been filled with speculation about their relationship’s stability.
Critics have often claimed that the couple is on the verge of separation, painting Harry as someone yearning for his life within the royal family.
Yet, their consistent displays of affection—like holding hands—seem to contradict this narrative, leaving some commentators feeling threatened by the reality of their bond.
From the moment they began dating, Harry and Meghan have made hand-holding a hallmark of their relationship.
It’s not just a casual gesture; it’s a part of their love language.
In their Netflix documentary, they even discussed how this physical connection brings them comfort and security.
So, what’s so shocking about them continuing this practice in public?
Woods’ article suggests that their hand-holding is a deliberate performance meant to showcase their closeness.
She implies that they want to be seen as different from William and Kate, who rarely display such affection in public.
But isn’t it a bit ironic?
If anything, Harry and Meghan’s actions highlight a genuine connection that many couples can relate to, while William and Kate’s distance seems more like a royal protocol than a reflection of true intimacy.
The criticism might stem from a deeper issue—jealousy.
Hand-holding is a natural expression of love, something many couples engage in.
If someone finds themselves irritated by such displays, could it be a reflection of their own lack of affection?
Woods’ remarks suggest that perhaps she’s grappling with her own feelings about love and connection.
Her article takes an even more bizarre turn when she states that seeing Harry and Meghan together triggers her.
She claims it’s unrealistic in the context of parenthood, yet countless couples, including those with multiple children, manage to express their love openly.
Look at Barack and Michelle Obama or Joe and Jill Biden—they continue to hold hands, showcasing their enduring affection despite the challenges of family life.
Woods also critiques Meghan’s affectionate nature, branding her as overly dependent on Harry.
This notion of feminism being at odds with showing love is outdated.
True feminism allows for vulnerability and affection, embracing the idea that strength can coexist with tenderness.
It’s baffling that Woods fails to grasp this fundamental truth.
Moreover, she paints Harry as a product of royal training, suggesting he’s been conditioned to suppress his emotions.
However, it seems that love has transformed him.
Since marrying Meghan, he has openly embraced affection, often reaching out to her in public.
This shift is a testament to how love can inspire change, fostering a more genuine connection.
Yet, the media continues to portray Meghan as the instigator of their hand-holding, ignoring Harry’s active role in this tender display.
He is often the one seeking connection, reinforcing the notion that Meghan is not solely responsible for their affectionate gestures.
It’s a partnership, rooted in mutual support and love.
Woods’ article comes off as bitter, almost envious of the happiness that Harry and Meghan radiate.
She seems to wish for them to mirror the more stoic approach of William and Kate, but that’s not who they are.
Harry and Meghan are unapologetically themselves, and their love is evident in every public appearance.
As the debate rages on, it’s clear that Harry and Meghan will continue to hold hands and express their love openly.
For every critic like Judith Woods, there are countless supporters who celebrate their relationship.
Wishing them happiness and success seems to be the best response to the ongoing scrutiny they face.
In the end, it’s essential to recognize that love, in all its forms, should be celebrated rather than criticized.
Harry and Meghan’s hand-holding is more than just a public display; it’s a symbol of their commitment to each other, and it’s a reminder that love can thrive even amidst adversity.
