In an unexpected revelation, Doria Raglan recently shared that she once served as a flight attendant for EasyJet during the 1980s.
This surprising claim, however, quickly met with skepticism when Johan Lundgren, the CEO of EasyJet, stepped in to clarify the timeline.
According to Lundgren, the airline didn’t even exist until 1995, long after Raglan’s alleged employment.
This contradiction has stirred up quite a storm, especially given the public profile of Doria’s daughter, Meghan Markle.
The backlash was swift, with Meghan reportedly taking issue with EasyJet’s dismissal of her mother’s claims.
Her reaction was one of indignation, as she accused the airline of undermining Doria’s life experiences.
Meghan made it clear that there would be repercussions for EasyJet’s stance, though what those might entail remains a mystery.
The tension between the Markle family and the airline has only intensified, leading many to speculate about Meghan’s next steps in defending her mother.
As journalists dig deeper into Doria Raglan’s background, further doubts regarding her narrative have surfaced.
Interviews with neighbors from the past and a review of 1980s yearbooks indicate that Doria spent much of that decade focused on her studies in social work rather than working in the airline industry.
These insights suggest that her recollection of her career may not be entirely accurate—whether due to a simple case of misremembering or perhaps a more intentional embellishment.
This discrepancy has sparked a flurry of speculation.
Some observers propose that Doria may have mixed up details from different phases of her life, while others suspect that she could be deliberately exaggerating her past to create a more intriguing backstory.
Regardless of the reason, the conflicting narratives have raised questions about her credibility and the authenticity of her experiences.
Adding another layer to the unfolding drama, Meghan has been vocal in her support for her mother.
During a recent charity event, she made a pointed comment emphasizing the necessity for companies to verify their facts before making public statements.
This remark was widely interpreted as a veiled jab at EasyJet, highlighting her frustration with the airline’s response to Doria’s claims.
Despite Meghan’s attempts to rally support for her mother, the mounting evidence against Doria’s assertion has left many wondering about the motivations behind her original statement.
Was this merely a slip of memory, or is there a larger agenda at play aimed at reshaping how Doria’s past is perceived?
As this controversy continues to unfold, speculation about Meghan’s potential legal actions against EasyJet has emerged.
Legal experts suggest that she might consider pursuing a defamation suit to protect her mother’s reputation.
However, such a move carries its own risks, particularly given the growing doubts surrounding Doria’s account.
For now, Meghan seems to be caught between a rock and a hard place—either she can maintain her public defense of her mother or let the situation gradually fade from the spotlight.
In either case, the implications of this scandal could tarnish the public’s perception of both Meghan and Doria.
With no clear resolution on the horizon, many are closely monitoring how this saga will evolve.
Will Doria eventually acknowledge a possible error in her statement, or will Meghan’s team take a more aggressive stance to vindicate her mother?
The uncertainty looms large, but one thing is evident: this incident adds yet another chapter to the ongoing narrative surrounding the Duchess of Sussex and her family.
