As the political scene in the United States undergoes significant changes, conversations surrounding Meghan Markle‘s title as the Duchess of Sussex are heating up.
A provocative question has surfaced: could a new administration potentially strip her of this royal designation?
With figures like Donald Trump hinting at a possible comeback to power, Meghan and her husband, Prince Harry, find themselves navigating a political landscape that seems increasingly hostile.
Rumors are swirling that Trump, notorious for his blunt criticism of the couple, might target Meghan’s royal title.
The argument is gaining traction that since this title hails from a foreign monarchy, it should not hold any weight over American citizens.
This line of thinking has sparked a fiery debate on whether the U.S. government could take action against Meghan’s title, especially if a leader who has openly disparaged her comes into power.
Political commentator Lee Cohen, who recently appeared on GB News, weighed in on the situation.
He suggested that the couple’s controversial departure from royal duties and their ongoing disputes with the British monarchy could lead to some form of political retribution.
Cohen’s comments come at a time when tensions are brewing, raising questions about the ramifications of their past actions.
The discussions often reference an 1810 proposal related to the U.S. Constitution, which aimed to prevent American citizens from holding titles from foreign nations.
This proposal emerged during a period of strained relations with Britain but was never ratified, leaving the matter somewhat ambiguous.
While it implies that foreign titles might pose a problem for Americans, it lacks the authority of official law.
John Witherspoon, a lawyer based in Washington D.C., shed light on this ongoing debate.
He clarified that although the 1810 proposal remains a point of discussion, it never became formal legislation.
Therefore, American citizens are permitted to inherit and use foreign titles, provided they do not pledge loyalty to a foreign power.
This means that Meghan can keep her title without jeopardizing her citizenship, as long as she maintains her allegiance to the United States.
Despite this legal clarity, speculation continues to swirl around the implications of a potential Trump presidency.
Many worry that issues regarding Meghan’s title may be revisited under a lens of renewed scrutiny.
During his previous term, Trump was vocally critical of the Sussexes, particularly Harry’s decision to step back from royal responsibilities.
Trump described Harry’s situation as one where the prince was “used horribly,” reflecting a broader sentiment among critics who believe the couple has strained their ties with both the royal family and the British public.
The possibility of Trump returning to the White House raises unsettling questions about whether Meghan’s title might become a focal point amid heightened political examination.
His documented disdain for the couple is well known, and he has also made it clear that he does not support covering the financial costs associated with their security, insisting that they should handle those expenses themselves.
As tensions mount between the Sussexes and the U.S. government, it seems plausible that Trump and his allies could target Meghan’s royal title as part of a broader critique of the couple.
