On May 12th, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry wrapped up their Nigerian tour with a glamorous reception at a polo club.
This event marked another high-profile appearance for the couple, who have been making headlines since they stepped back from royal duties.
Meghan, ever the fashionista, showcased her third outfit change of the day, donning a chic beige summer ensemble that sparked conversations not only about style but also about her choice to go braless once again.
One can’t help but wonder if she even owns a bra at this point.
The polo field, a playground for the wealthy elite, served as the backdrop for this charity event.
But why choose polo over more accessible sports like football?
The couple’s decision to attend a prestigious polo match raises eyebrows, especially considering the organization’s questionable history since its inception in 1904.
While the event was framed as a charitable endeavor, many suspect it may be tainted by underlying corruption.
Meghan’s fashion choices during the tour have been a topic of discussion.
Her repeated decisions to forgo traditional undergarments seem deliberate, despite her self-proclaimed role as a positive influence.
As the couple settled into their seats, they appeared somewhat isolated, separated from the rest of the attendees by a curtain.
This physical barrier mirrored their emotional detachment from the reality surrounding them.
Polo may hold significance for some, yet the couple’s apparent lack of enthusiasm for the sport left many puzzled.
Questions arose about Harry’s military background and his commitment to the Invictus Games, leading some to label the tour as more of a publicity stunt rather than an authentic engagement with the local community.
Royal biographer Angela Levin expressed her disapproval of the couple’s unofficial visit, describing it as disingenuous and disappointing.
During an appearance on GB News, she voiced her astonishment at their initial outings, particularly criticizing Meghan’s outfit choice for a visit to Lightway Academy College.
“If you’re visiting a quiet religious school, a dress with no backing is hardly appropriate,” she remarked.
Levin didn’t stop there; she recounted an encounter where Meghan allegedly displayed rudeness towards a teacher during the tour.
According to Levin, Meghan seemed more interested in capturing flattering photos with Harry than engaging with the people around her.
This incident painted a picture of the couple as out of touch, prioritizing their image over genuine interaction.
Critics were quick to point out that Harry and Meghan appeared to be leveraging their royal connections for personal gain.
At an event hosted at the Nigerian Defence Headquarters in Abuja, the couple’s chairs were labeled with their royal titles rather than their first names, raising questions about their intentions.
Royal expert Robert Jobson weighed in, suggesting that they seem to cling to the very titles they’ve publicly criticized.
“Why can’t they just be themselves?”
Jobson questioned.
He lamented that while Harry’s mother, Diana, was simply known as Diana, her son seems unable to shed the royal labels.
This insistence on maintaining their titles suggests a struggle between their past as royals and their current aspirations.
At the same event, Harry faced scrutiny for inspecting Nigerian troops, a role that seemed more fitting for his former life as a working royal.
Video footage captured him being greeted with a ceremonial performance, prompting royal commentator Kinsey Schofield to describe the scene as peculiar.
“This is something he would have done ten years ago,” she noted, highlighting the disconnect between his current status and past responsibilities.
