In the latest buzz surrounding Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex is stepping into the culinary spotlight with a new show on Netflix.
Drawing comparisons to Brooklyn Beckham, who has also ventured into the world of cooking, Meghan’s upcoming series promises to celebrate the joys of cooking, gardening, entertaining, and friendship.
Alongside her husband, Prince Harry, she is set to explore the competitive polo scene, showcasing another facet of their partnership with the streaming giant.
However, not everyone is convinced that Meghan’s foray into cooking is a genuine passion project.
Charlotte Griffiths, editor of the Mail on Sunday, expressed skepticism about the authenticity of Meghan’s culinary endeavors.
During an interview with GB News, Griffiths pointed out that Meghan’s previous cooking experience, which included a rather lackluster recipe for toast, raises questions about her skills in the kitchen.
“Who would tune in to watch Meghan cook if she hadn’t married into royalty?”
she posed, suggesting that the royal connection is the true draw for viewers.
Griffiths didn’t hold back, recalling Meghan’s past attempts at cooking shows and suggesting that they lacked excitement.
“Watching her last cooking segment was akin to watching paint dry,” she remarked, hinting that Meghan’s culinary reputation leaves much to be desired.
With a history of only sharing a simple toast recipe topped with ricotta and jam, Griffiths believes Meghan may not have the chops to captivate an audience.
The editor speculated that this new cooking venture could serve as an attempt by Meghan to soften her public persona.
She recalled Meghan’s previous controversial moments, like her banana incident, and noted that while Meghan has engaged in charitable cooking projects, such as a cookbook for Grenfell, she remains skeptical about the sincerity behind these efforts.
Griffiths believes that Meghan’s portrayal as a gentle home-cook doesn’t align with her ambitious and determined personality.
While some may see Meghan’s ambitions as commendable, Griffiths argues that comparing her to Brooklyn Beckham is unfair to him.
Brooklyn, despite facing his own challenges, has shown a genuine interest in culinary arts, experimenting with various dishes.
In contrast, Meghan’s skills seem to pale in comparison, leading Griffiths to suggest that the two should collaborate to create something memorable—albeit possibly cringeworthy.
Interestingly, the royal couple’s relationship with the Beckhams has also come under scrutiny.
Reports have emerged that Meghan and Harry were notably absent from Brooklyn Beckham and Nicola Peltz’s wedding guest list.
This omission is particularly striking given David Beckham’s close friendship with Prince Harry.
The guest list included high-profile names like Gordon Ramsay, yet the Sussexes were left out, raising eyebrows about their standing within the celebrity circle.
Messages that surfaced recently reveal a conversation between Nicola Peltz and her mother, Claudia, regarding the guest list.
When Claudia inquired about Meghan’s invitation, Nicola responded with, “Who’s Meghan?”
This exchange suggests a significant disconnect between the Sussexes and the Peltz-Beckham clan, further fueling speculation about their social dynamics.
As Meghan embarks on this new journey in the culinary world, many are left wondering whether she can truly carve out a niche for herself.
Will she be able to rise above the skepticism and prove her culinary worth?
Or will she find herself overshadowed by the likes of other celebrity chefs who have successfully navigated the same waters?
With the backdrop of her royal connections and public image, Meghan’s new show will undoubtedly attract attention.
Yet, the question remains: how much of that attention is based on her culinary talents versus her title as a former duchess?
