In the ongoing legal saga between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, tensions are escalating over their shared ownership of the renowned French winery, Chateau Miraval.
Recent court filings from Jolie’s legal team have ignited a firestorm, as they allege that Pitt has been attempting to manipulate the situation by pushing for a revised non-disclosure agreement aimed at silencing her regarding allegations of abuse.
Sources close to Pitt have pushed back against these claims, suggesting that this latest legal maneuver is just another attempt by Jolie to distract from her own actions.
According to insiders, it was Jolie who initially sought a non-disclosure agreement during their divorce proceedings, not Pitt.
This fact, they argue, undermines the credibility of Jolie’s accusations and highlights a deeper issue within their protracted dispute.
The crux of the matter lies in Jolie’s decision to sell her stake in the winery, a move that Pitt’s camp contends violates an earlier agreement stipulating that neither party could sell their shares without mutual consent.
This breach, they assert, has significant implications for their children’s inheritance, further complicating an already fraught situation.
As the legal battle drags on, it has become intertwined with ongoing custody disputes concerning their children, several of whom are now adults.
The overlap of these issues has only added to the emotional strain on the family, with both sides accusing each other of making the situation more personal than necessary.
Jolie’s lawyers have argued that she should not be silenced, especially as a survivor of alleged maltreatment.
They point out that Jolie has never filed formal charges against Pitt and left their shared assets intact, even as she attempted to initiate the sale of the winery.
When Pitt expressed dissatisfaction with her actions, he resorted to legal action, which has now spiraled into a larger confrontation.
On July 15, Pitt’s legal team filed a motion to dismiss Jolie’s request for his personal communications, arguing that her demands were unreasonable.
They claimed that Jolie wanted access to sensitive information related to therapy sessions he participated in following a tumultuous family flight in 2016, which ultimately led to their separation.
Pitt’s team contends that he has already agreed to provide sufficient documentation regarding the incident.
In contrast, Jolie’s attorneys maintain that she has no interest in prolonging the litigation and has refrained from publicly discussing these matters for years.
They assert that Pitt forfeited any claims to privacy when he initiated the lawsuit against her.
This ongoing tug-of-war has revealed the complexities of their relationship, with both sides vying for control over the narrative.
Adding fuel to the fire, Pitt is reportedly seeking $67 million in damages from Jolie, which he frames as a response to her refusal to comply with their previous agreements.
This demand has raised eyebrows and sparked further debate about the motivations behind their legal strategies.
A recent report from People magazine highlighted that nearly eight years after their split, Pitt and Jolie are still negotiating the terms of their divorce settlement.
